Thursday, January 31, 2013

Proposal: Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely

Timed out, reached quorum, enacted 8-2. Josh gains 2 Credibility, Spitemaster and Koen lose 1 Credibility each for voting against, Clucky, Murphy, robo1995 and scshunt all lose 1 Credibility for not voting. Josh

Adminned at 03 Feb 2013 02:41:53 UTC

Add the following to the end of the rule entitled Credibility:

Any Honourable Member who is Corrupt cannot gain Credibility.

Wherever a dynastic rule other than the rule entitled Credibility specifies a quantity of Credibility, double it.

posted by Josh at 31 Jan 2013 15:00:52 UTC Comments (10)

Comments

Spitemaster:

31-01-2013 18:16:46 UTC

Considering we just cut the starting Credibility by 4, against

Josh: Observer he/they

31-01-2013 18:28:23 UTC

In the past ten days, only a handful of players have lost more then three or four credibility. If we’re going to threaten Corruption seriously before the dynasty actually ends, credibility loss needs to be a proper threat.

RaichuKFM: she/her

31-01-2013 20:41:11 UTC

for

nqeron:

31-01-2013 20:47:18 UTC

for per Josh.

Also, that gives me an idea for an interesting COV, which may be where people are going.

Larrytheturtle:

31-01-2013 22:20:26 UTC

for

Cpt_Koen:

31-01-2013 23:18:19 UTC

against Please note that this against vote has nothing to do with me having the second lowest credibility.

Klisz:

31-01-2013 23:32:28 UTC

for

Patrick:

31-01-2013 23:49:54 UTC

for
And Josh, I simply must commend you for your spelling of the word “credibility” in this proposal. Simply spectacular.

Skju:

01-02-2013 01:16:31 UTC

for per Josh’s comment.

Purplebeard:

01-02-2013 07:28:28 UTC

for