Proposal: Admin Option 1
13-1, cannot be enacted w/o CoV -Darth
Adminned at 14 Dec 2009 05:14:57 UTC
In Rule 1.5 Enactment, immediately after the sentence:
Whenever an Admin marks a proposal, CfJ, or DoV as passed or failed, he must also mark his name, and report the final tally of votes (or the fact that it was self-killed or vetoed).
add:
When reporting the vote tally, he should indicate the number of FOR votes followed by the number of AGAINST votes followed by the number of unresolved DEFERENTIAL votes, if any.
The way I’ve always seen it done.
Comments
Ornithopter:
Do unresolved deferential votes need to be reported at all? They’re identical to people not voting. They don’t even count as votes for the “more than half of all votes” that need to be “for” when a proposal times out.
Hix:
Josh:
Falkuon:
Kevan:
SingularByte:
Klisz:
Klisz:
Oops
clicked the wrong button
Ienpw III:
Bucky:
tecslicer:
Wakukee:
Per hix. If it is clear, it doesn’t matter.
Klisz:
Wak: You didn’t actually click the voting icon…
Darknight:
tecslicer:
Well, I my church we always do the For, then the against, then the abstentions, so that is an example in RL, but Baptist business meetings have never been the epitome of proper parliamentary procedure.
Klisz:
Also, people will get angry if you start dragging religion into BlogNomic. In any way.
Wakukee:
lol
.
TrumanCapote: