Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Proposal: Attention Seeking Behaviour

Vetoed -SingularByte

Adminned at 22 May 2009 08:42:44 UTC

change

If a Contestant is in the Diary Room he may make a diary entry by making a post on the main page with the title “Diary Entry - “mm/dd” “Name”” where “mm/dd” is the month and date of the post as recorded in the sidebar and “Name” is that Contestant’s name. The body of the post should describe something that happened to the Contestant during the day and/or how the Contestant is feeling. After making a diary entry the contestant must change his location to some room other than the Diary Room and may not set his location to the Diary Room again for 72 hours.

to read

If a Contestant is in the Diary Room he must make a diary entry by making a post on the main page with the title “Diary Entry - “mm/dd” “Name”” where “mm/dd” is the month and date of the post as recorded in the sidebar and “Name” is that Contestant’s name. The body of the post should describe something that happened to the Contestant during the day and/or how the Contestant is feeling. After making a diary entry the contestant must change his location to some room other than the Diary Room and may not set his location to the Diary Room again for 72 hours.

Comments

Influenza:

05-20-2009 20:01:20 UTC

Does this mean that the contestant *must* make the entry simultaneously at the moment they enter the Diary Room? Or does this just mean that they have to make an entry before they leave? I’m confused.

Ienpw III:

05-20-2009 20:10:06 UTC

And what happens if they don’t?

ais523:

05-20-2009 20:27:51 UTC

against I think this leads to all sorts of trouble if the Contestant in question breaks the rules; probably a CFJ would be needed to sort out the situation after that. Instead of saying that something must happen, specify consequences for it not happening.

Kevan:

05-20-2009 20:31:32 UTC

You can just make a proposal of “replace ‘may’ with ‘must’”, if that’s all you’re changing, you know.

against Per ais523.

Bucky:

05-20-2009 21:05:33 UTC

against

Ienpw III:

05-20-2009 21:09:39 UTC

against  Per ais

Yoda:

05-20-2009 21:31:04 UTC

against

Klisz:

05-20-2009 21:49:59 UTC

against  per ais, and per Kevan, because the “huge boxes for one change” makes me think it’s a scam.

Qwazukee:

05-20-2009 22:01:22 UTC

against , although it’s not a scam.

Darknight:

05-20-2009 22:13:59 UTC

against

delta:

05-21-2009 08:33:13 UTC

against Per Ais and DC.

TAE:

05-21-2009 11:08:39 UTC

against

arthexis:

05-21-2009 15:35:02 UTC

against

ais523:

05-21-2009 17:41:10 UTC

veto Not quite antiquorumed, but this seems to have no chance of passing.