This proposal does nothing, besides creating the GNDT column. It doen’t alter the Ruleset so it would make valid its lingering effects.

exactly. Plus, what does Washed up mean? This just seems a little… strange.

This doesn’t alter the ruleset. 

People were objecting to the consequences of becoming Washed Up, so I thought I would just create the Rehab column and see if it evolved into something else in a later proposal.  I don’t really see how this is any different than creating the Wealth colum, which doesn’t seem to have much effect on anything else at the moment.

I like the idea, but I think another   method should be used to determine if one goes into rehab or not. For example, something tying to gossip stories could be used. Going into rehab could cost fame/wealth and tying it to gossip stories would make the game more interesting.

Even if this did enact an actual rule, requiring only luck to avoid negative traits doesn’t seem very interesting.

Ah, right, the minor ‘you should create a rule that does these things’  problem.

I’m not sure there’s anything in the ruleset right now that says that the ruleset must contain all rules, though.

until the problems addressed above are fixed

[Grasshopper] Rule 1.2 says that proposals should “change the Ruleset or Gamestate”, and Rule 1.5 says that admin enacting proposals should update “the Ruleset and/or Gamestate”.

Also “This is the Ruleset for BlogNomic; all Actors must obey it.” in Rule 1.1. If there are any rules outside the ruleset, we don’t have to obey them. (If we did, I’d write down “Kevan wins” on a piece of paper.)

Needs to be a rule, ala ChronosPhaenon and Clucky

per the doesn’t-alter-the-ruleset decision

Counter-bandwagon