Proposal: Blue Sky Printing
Reaches quorum at 15-3. Might also have timed out. -Purplebeard
Adminned at 04 Mar 2010 10:06:04 UTC
To Rule 2.2 (Inventions), add:-
If the only effect of a Proposal is to add a single Part to the Ruleset, or to amend a single Part, and if its title includes the word “Blueprint”, it is known as a Blueprint Proposal. A Commoner’s oldest pending Blueprint Proposal is not counted as a Proposal for the clause of “unless the Commoner already has 2 Proposals pending” in Rule 1.3.
Comments
lordcooper:
Josh:
ais523:
digibomber:
Roujo:
Klisz:
Ienpw III:
Hix:
Keba:
Also, as i stated somewhere else, I dont want to have that much inventions (or parts) at this early time…
I would vote for such a Proposal in ~ two weeks.
Put:
Kevan:
[Keba] This is intended to allow a background trickle of new Parts, without forcing players to give up slots they’d otherwise use for fixes or larger game mechanics. If you don’t think the dynasty needs many more Parts, though, fair enough.
Keba:
Well, ive thought about this again.
At first, there is no need for “one part per proposal”, as most part-proposals pass. Is there any one-part-propsal, which failed or is going to fail?
Also, I would like to have other mechanics than scavenging and inventing all the time. Aix proposed yesterday an idea in IRC, which allows raiding instead of scavenging. Such methods would be much nicer, I think.
PS: I hope I am allowed to write in this comment information about IRC discussions?
Darknight:
dbdougla:
Purplebeard:
tecslicer:
yabbaguy:
At minimum, scrap the part of “adding one *part*” to the ruleset. We’re practically begging for that to be abused since “Part” isn’t defined IIRC.
yabbaguy:
Wait, I’m dumb. Part as in an invention part- not “part of the ruleset”. Vote stands though.
Qwazukee:
Bucky:
Kevan:
“Part” is clearly defined by the ruleset.