Thursday, December 24, 2009

Proposal: Boon Landing

Passes 16-0-1.—alethiophile

Adminned at 26 Dec 2009 15:52:23 UTC

Enact a new subrule of Rule 2.2, called “Boons”:-

As a weekly action, the Djinni may select a random Adventurer from those with fewer than three Wishes, and increase their Wishes by one. This action is known as Granting a Boon.

If the Djinni has not Granted a Boon during the past seven days, and if at least one Adventurer has fewer than three Wishes, then any Adventurer may move the Djinni into the Lamp, if he is not already there.

The Djinni is considered to have granted a Boon at 21:53 GMT on the 24th of December 2009. Any Adventurer may remove this paragraph from the ruleset after the Djinni has Granted a Boon other than this one.

A small incentive to get more people wishing.

posted by Kevan at 24 Dec 2009 21:51:22 UTC Comments (17)

Comments

tecslicer:

24-12-2009 23:04:19 UTC

for simple, effective…I like it.

spikebrennan:

24-12-2009 23:19:31 UTC

for

There:

25-12-2009 00:05:57 UTC

for as long as the Djinni actually chooses randomly. If the Djinn just picks someone then I would be against this.

Ornithopter:

25-12-2009 00:43:33 UTC

for

90000:

25-12-2009 00:46:28 UTC

for Yep, this lets the djinn play favorites, but E already can.

Klisz:

25-12-2009 01:21:20 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

25-12-2009 01:34:00 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

25-12-2009 02:37:48 UTC

for

Zephyr:

25-12-2009 03:16:49 UTC

for

SingularByte: he/him

25-12-2009 08:43:07 UTC

for

ais523:

25-12-2009 09:13:21 UTC

“select a random Adventurer” to me would imply that it should be random, preferably using the GNDT. (And for.)

redtara: they/them

25-12-2009 15:39:58 UTC

Although I wonder about the effectiveness of using a wish in the attempt to get another wish.

Oze:

25-12-2009 16:39:23 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

26-12-2009 05:25:54 UTC

imperial Why not just specify “random” as “DICEs the GNDT?”

alethiophile:

26-12-2009 06:09:49 UTC

for I like it. I think ‘random’ sufficiently implies actual randomness; if not, someone propose a fix.

Uvthenfuv:

26-12-2009 20:16:09 UTC

for

NoOneImportant:

26-12-2009 21:48:34 UTC

for