Monday, January 19, 2009

Proposal: Clarity

Veto after SK—arth

Adminned at 20 Jan 2009 07:15:21 UTC

In Core Rule 1.5 Enactment, immediately before the sentence, “Whenever an Admin marks a proposal as enacted or failed, he must also mark his name, and report the final tally of votes (or the fact that the proposal was self-killed or vetoed),” add the sentence, “Non-Admins may not enact or fail proposals.”

Because this has been bothering me.

Comments

Wooden Squid:

01-19-2009 20:27:47 UTC

for Fair enough.

Wakukee:

01-19-2009 20:39:34 UTC

against Because Demi-admins can only enact their own proposals.

Qwazukee:

01-19-2009 20:46:37 UTC

Which the ruleset does not allow for in the first place.

Wakukee:

01-19-2009 20:48:03 UTC

Then make somthing for them, don’t exclude them!

Qwazukee:

01-19-2009 20:50:33 UTC

The reason for Admins is so that enactments are made responsibly. The reason this is important is because a Non-Admin might enact his own proposal when it should not be allowed to be enacted. The ruleset does not yet explicitly forbid this.

Amnistar:

01-19-2009 20:51:14 UTC

for

Agreed.

Also, please follow the rules for enactment people, put your names on things!

Wakukee:

01-19-2009 20:52:01 UTC

I wouldn’t do this, but you may be right…  imperial COV. Somthing can be made later if needed to give Demi-admins more power.

Wakukee:

01-19-2009 20:53:26 UTC

I better try to enact somthing while I still can. May I enact Space Moneyses 2?

arthexis:

01-19-2009 21:12:41 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

01-19-2009 21:17:00 UTC

against s/k

arthexis:

01-20-2009 15:14:49 UTC

veto for Speed