Thursday, March 09, 2006

Proposal: Concern about concern about concerns

Timed out, failed 6 votes to 7. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 11 Mar 2006 22:56:04 UTC

Change “Dosh Production Groups” in the first clause of “Dosh Concern” to “Dosh Production Groups, or DPGs

Replace

If a Gostak wishes to change eir Dosh Production Group, e must make an official post declaring e wishes to do so, and may switch only after that post recieves more FOR votes than AGAINST votes from the members of that Dosh Production Group after 24 hours.

or

Gostak are occasionally permitted to leave their Dosh Production Groups. If a Gostak wishes to leave eir Dosh Production Group, e must make an official post declaring e wishes to do so, and may leave only after that post receives more FOR votes than AGAINST votes from the members of that Dosh Production Group after 24 hours.

, whichever the case may be (depending on whether “concerned about dosh concerns” passes), to

If a post requires a Group Vote from a DPG, members of that DPG may vote either FOR or AGAINST the post.  If, after 24 hours, the post has more FOR votes from Gostaks belonging to the DPG than AGAINST votes from Gostaks belonging to the DPG, the post is said to pass the Group Vote from the DPG.

If a Gostak wishes to change eir Dosh Production Group, e must make an official post declaring e wishes to do so, and may switch only after that post passes a Group Vote from the DPG e wishes to switch into.

A Gostak must be in one Dosh Production Group at all times after e has joined one.

Add a subrule to “Dosh Concern”, “Group Abilities”:

A DPG may change its name if any Gostak belonging to the DPG makes a post requesting a name change and what to change the name to, and the post passes a Group Vote from the DPG.

A DPG may give any amount of its Dosh to any other DPG if a Gostak makes a post suggesting the donation and that post passes a Group Vote from the DPG that would lose Dosh in the transaction.

After this proposal passes, all Gostaks must roll DICE4 to join a Group within a week, or be idled.

If the Rule “Dosh Concern” does not exist, this Proposal does nothing.

Comments

Rodney:

03-09-2006 18:44:09 UTC

for

Bucky:

03-09-2006 21:16:20 UTC

for

Banja:

03-09-2006 22:36:34 UTC

for

predisastered:

03-09-2006 23:25:47 UTC

for I’ll go ahead and self-kill my proposal in favor of this solution.

Shadowclaw:

03-10-2006 01:32:01 UTC

for

Kevan:

03-10-2006 10:39:20 UTC

for

Excalabur:

03-10-2006 13:05:04 UTC

imperial

Josh:

03-10-2006 17:48:52 UTC

against I don’t like it, for one reason: Right now, Shadowclaw could propose to change the name of GDPDC to ‘Shadowclaw may declare victory at any time’ and there would be nothing anyone could do to stop him.

smith:

03-10-2006 18:27:18 UTC

against
Josh is right. The naming problem is still a major bug in the ruleset.

Purplebeard:

03-10-2006 19:23:47 UTC

against

Angry Grasshopper:

03-10-2006 20:08:04 UTC

Those Concerns would be in Boldface in the ruleset, yes? 

for

Elias IX:

03-11-2006 02:05:37 UTC

against Groups shouldn’t be mandatory.

Angry Grasshopper:

03-11-2006 07:10:28 UTC

CoV, Elias IX is absolutely right. How’d I miss?

against

Kevan:

03-11-2006 16:13:54 UTC

against

Igthorn:

03-11-2006 19:21:40 UTC

against