Proposal: Enough Already
self-killed
failed by Hix
Adminned at 04 Feb 2007 20:40:42 UTC
Upon passage of this proposal, the mode of speech known as Spivak will be banned, because we can’t be walking around the streets of L.A. talking like that.
self-killed
failed by Hix
Adminned at 04 Feb 2007 20:40:42 UTC
Upon passage of this proposal, the mode of speech known as Spivak will be banned, because we can’t be walking around the streets of L.A. talking like that.
posted by peacefulwarrior at 03 Feb 2007 11:34:00 UTC Comments (22)
3.2887

Comments
snowballinhell7001:
Sadly, although it was a noble attempt at gender neutrality, it is cumbersome and hard to read aloud.
Elias IX:
Clucky:
Spivak is fun.
Rodney:
Rodney:
In general, banning things in the ruleset without actually removing them from the ruleset is usually a bad idea.
peacefulwarrior:
Right, I didn’t realize that. Point noted. I meant to say remove it from the ruleset. I would modify it, but it appears to be meeting with stiff opposition.
alethiophile:
Excalabur:
peacefulwarrior:
The thing is… I don’t FEEL gender neutral… heh.
Clucky:
Now adays, I often used spivak instead of normal prepositions.
Josh:
Scaramouche:
I hate spivak but this proposal doesn’t actually include changes of all the Spivak-related rules in the ‘set, so we’d have an antinomy.
Hix:
ChinDoGu:
Kevan:
viewtyjoe:
Angry Grasshopper:
Not my Spivak, sir or madam!
Angry Grasshopper:
Hey, does anyone know a Spivak honorific?
spikebrennan:
No, ser.
peacefulwarrior:
Mamser?
(pron. “mahmzer”, from ma’am + sir)
As in, How ya doin, Mamser Grasshopper?
I would propose this as part of the dynastic ruleset but I already have 2 pending.
Combustable:
peacefulwarrior: