Oh, and yes, Ninjas have ships.  Ships of Ninjas that sneak up in the dead of night and board you before you notice anything.

Why can’t you just say “Maybe take no other actions outlined in section 2 of the ruleset.”?

I would actually prefer if a Captain could have no Ship or rather, allow for a Captain to share Ship with others (technically, as proposed the rule doesn’t say you ship name has to be unique…). I’ll vote yes for now and may propose an ammendment later if it passes. 

Actually, it does say that it “may not be the same as any other Ship’s name.”

Also, the way you worded the “Pirate or Ninja” rule, you can’t propose a rule, make a CfJ, make any kind of post, or perform any Admin action until you choose a side.

I think I like Clucky’s idea for a substitute clause.  But for now .

Whops. Got me. Thinking about what Yoda says makes me change my vote to

I thought you wanted to get this Dynasty underway, Yoda?

Actually, I’m fine with requiring picking sides before allowing any further action. I mean… why not?

What if something later causes you to loose your Role? It could lock you out for good.

Alright, I guess.

I like it.

“and may only vote or set eir Role until eir Role IS CHOSEN”

You could choose a role and later LOSE it, but still fulfill that rule.

COV with Fix

after clucky’s fix