Sunday, August 24, 2014

Proposal: Fixing “Appreciating Goods”

Reached quorum 7 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 25 Aug 2014 03:25:13 UTC

In rule 2.2 “Second-Hand Goods” replace “An Appreciating Good has a name, an ID, and a Real Value, and is written in the GNDT as Name—X (#.#.#). X defaults to zero.” with

An Appreciating Good has a name, an ID, and a Real Value (which defaults to zero), and is written in the GNDT as “Name—X (#.#.#)”, where X represents the Real Value of the Good.

In rule 2.4 “Flea Market” replace “...he will use the same Offer if the same Seller takes the same Good (or another Good with the same Name, Category, Subcategory and Significance as it) to the Flea Market at a later point.” with

he will use the same Offer if the same Seller takes any Good with the same Name, Category, Subcategory, Significance, and Real Value as it to the Flea Market at a later point. (The Real Values of all Static Goods are considered equal.)

I think these will make the Appreciating Goods rule work in a way that makes sense.

Comments

Sprucial:

24-08-2014 17:17:28 UTC

for

RaichuKFM: she/her

24-08-2014 17:47:27 UTC

for

Sylphrena:

24-08-2014 17:54:25 UTC

By the way, I notice that the Second-hand Goods page has not been updated. Is that because I didn’t ask for it properly or is it because no one remembered to?

Doctor29:

24-08-2014 18:17:33 UTC

for lilomar enacted wrong. The GDNT also hasn’t been updated. Let’s publicly ridicule him until it is fixed xD

ayesdeeef:

24-08-2014 18:43:51 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

24-08-2014 19:20:32 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

24-08-2014 19:27:14 UTC

I’ve updated the Goods page. What hasn’t been updated in the GNDT?

ayesdeeef:

24-08-2014 19:49:39 UTC

Nothing, actually. Thanks Kevan; now lilomar should feel really bad :D

ayesdeeef:

24-08-2014 21:39:14 UTC

Although you should feel bad too now… This could have been enacted when you cast your vote

lilomar:

24-08-2014 21:43:52 UTC

Narf. I did update the goods page. I think I forgot to save. for

ayesdeeef:

24-08-2014 22:12:04 UTC

Both lilomar and Kevan voted on this Proposal without passing it lol.

Kevan: he/him

24-08-2014 22:45:06 UTC

[ayesdeeef] Proposals can’t be enacted until they’ve been open for voting for 12 hours, if you’re laughing at the fact that two admins didn’t process it?

ayesdeeef:

24-08-2014 23:39:00 UTC

oh, okay. Jokes on me again. WHY???