Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Proposal: Fixing it now

s/k—alethiophile

Adminned at 16 Dec 2009 18:38:54 UTC

If rule “Possession” exists, reword it as follows:

As a weekly action, provided their own power is greater than one, the Djinni may take any action as defined by the dynastic rules for an adventurer of their choice, with the sole exception of making a wish. Any effects on gamestate are applied as if that adventurer had taken the action. The Djinni must then make a post to the blog stating the action taken, and by which adventurer

The riders aren’t going to pass.

Comments

Josh:

12-15-2009 12:19:49 UTC

for

Darknight:

12-15-2009 13:00:47 UTC

imperial

alethiophile:

12-15-2009 14:02:48 UTC

for
Probably a better idea to s/k the old one and redo, but this works too.

Klisz:

12-15-2009 16:59:16 UTC

for

Hix:

12-15-2009 17:13:13 UTC

against

NoOneImportant:

12-15-2009 17:14:11 UTC

imperial

Better. Whoever enacts this, if it passes, add a period to the end. ;)

TrumanCapote:

12-15-2009 17:55:23 UTC

imperial

Kevan:

12-15-2009 17:55:59 UTC

imperial

Ornithopter:

12-15-2009 20:38:02 UTC

for

tecslicer:

12-15-2009 20:53:50 UTC

for

Wakukee:

12-15-2009 21:27:27 UTC

imperial

Wakukee:

12-15-2009 21:28:17 UTC

Hmm… this seems abruptly cut off…

SingularByte:

12-15-2009 22:19:08 UTC

imperial

Ienpw III:

12-15-2009 23:24:30 UTC

6-1
5 UDEFs.

Wak: A period is missing.

digibomber:

12-16-2009 05:53:27 UTC

against

Oze:

12-16-2009 15:55:28 UTC

against

spikebrennan:

12-16-2009 16:44:55 UTC

against

Nausved:

12-16-2009 23:02:48 UTC

for

alethiophile:

12-17-2009 01:04:46 UTC

6-4 in favor.

alethiophile:

12-17-2009 02:33:37 UTC

Can we s/k or veto this one? The one it modifies failed.

Ienpw III:

12-17-2009 02:37:11 UTC

against