Like I said, there needs to be a way for existing propals that are in the old encryption to still be valid.  The way it is now, I can change the encryption method if I don’t like a proposal just so that it has no effect.

How is this a problem for you, then? I would have grabbed that opportunity. But if you really object to having veto power . . . oh wait. You already have a far easier way to veto proposals. So what’s the problem (other than a slight lag everytime you want to change encryptions)?

That any time I choose to change encryptions, the existing proposals are doomed to failure.

So you wait a tiny bit before implementing the encryption change. Like, 48 hours max, since there would be no reason to make new proposals in an old encryption that needed to be changed.

Perhaps Take 3 could override the rule which prevents people from editing proposals after they’re commented on.

  s/k in favor of take 3

to clear