Friday, December 26, 2008

Proposal: [GNO]Imperial Diplomacy

timed out, 6 - NOTHING, what what
enacted by elias ix

Adminned at 28 Dec 2008 18:12:33 UTC

Add a new subrule to the Rule “Gnomic Gnostic Church of GNO” in the GNO Ruleset.  Call it “Imperial Decrees” and give it the following text:

The wiki page called “Gnomish Scrolls” shall contain GNO faction gamestate that is sacred to the Church or the contents of an Imperial decree.  The Gnomish Scrolls may only be modified as the GNO faction ruleset permits.  Any other attempt to modify the Gnomish Scrolls shall be immediately reverted.

Add a new subrule to the rule “Holy GNOmish Empire” in the GNO faction ruleset.  Call it “Imperialism” and give it the following text:

There is a section of the Gnomish Scrolls called the “Oath of Fealty”.  If another faction’s ruleset has the Oath of Fealty as a Rule, except with XXXX in the Oath of Fealty replaced by the name of a Disciple and YYY is replaced by that Faction’s name, and that Rule is in full effect, that Disciple’s Gnomes shall be treated as if it were 60 higher than the amount in the GNDT for the purposes of victory conditions.

Create the “Gnomish Scrolls” wiki page.  Add the following text to that wiki page in a section called “Oath of Fealty”:

We recognize the authority of the Holy Gnomish Empire as guaranteed by XXXX and willingly submit the GNO Faction’s wise and benevolent government.  To allow more effective governance, GNO Faction proposals may modify YYY Faction Ruleset and Gamestate, and the Supreme Being may vote on and veto YYY Faction proposals.

Comments

Rodney:

27-12-2008 01:18:34 UTC

for

Cayvie:

27-12-2008 01:52:56 UTC

for
wow.

perfect.

Elias IX:

27-12-2008 02:06:17 UTC

for

teucer:

27-12-2008 06:17:03 UTC

for

Not quite perfect, though - some other faction could announce that it was going to let itself change that wiki page, because the rule stopping them is only added to faction GNO.

Elias IX:

27-12-2008 06:32:05 UTC

I believe “Any other attempt to modify the Gnomish Scrolls shall be immediately reverted.” nicely covers that?

423627812525782020526019554040884
847161927874680412508801416141124
694939607736416265449751867387592
510240016137892052146313502715594
708170930654281270638948412986034
980545220626259651147313611126306
744083674415524452196929669321163
901627772231092583404779568892735
590951425591275832839090578797063
674660902583494062947795631152628
753884061933613764322356877368055
626970801206079

Bucky:

27-12-2008 15:54:50 UTC

Elias, that loophole won’t work.  My follow-up proposal explains why while also doing something sneaky.

Yoda:

27-12-2008 16:27:16 UTC

for