Proposal: HOOC award.
Quorums at 9-0. Enacted. - lilomar
“The Lone Wolf” is nullified.
Adminned at 14 Aug 2010 15:25:55 UTC
Create an ULTRAVIOLET rule, “Hero of our Complex” with no Text.
Create a subrule of “Hero of our Complex”, “Behind Every Great Citizen…”:-
If there is an ULTRAVIOLET Citizen who is not the High-Programmer, then the Citizen with the highest non-ULTRAVIOLET Clearance (if there is one) has Achieved Victory.
Create a subrule of “Hero of our Complex”, “A Shining Example”:-
If any Citizen has a negative Treason score, and that score is at least five less than all other Citizens Treason score, then that Citzen has Achieved Victory.
Create a subrule of “Hero of our Complex”, “The Lone Wolf”:-
If a Citizen has been in a Sector for the past 48 hours, and they have been the only Citizen in that Sector for that entire time, then that Citizen has Achieved Victory.”
If at least 3 EVCs on this proposal contain the name of a subrule which would be created by this proposal, do not create that subrule.
Further VCs SHOULD be subrules of “Hero of our Complex”.
Comments
Darknight:
lilomar:
The idea is that scamming to UV might be rather easy, but scamming someone else to UV (with or without their cooperation) might be worth a win.
Bucky:
Before voting FOR this, I’d like an assurance from lilomar that he will not use his powers to play Kingmaker (particularly with Behind Every Great Citizen)
lilomar:
I hereby vow not to favor any Citizen (or Officer) to procede me as High-Programmer. I cannot guarantee than I will not take any actions that will lead to a Citizen Achieving Victory, but I will attempt not to do so, or will do so in a manner which is fair to all, to the best of my abilities.
jmrdex:
Behind Every Great Citizen…
A Shining Example
The Lone Wolf
For the sake of FUN, which is mandatory.
lilomar:
I had a feeling someone was going to do that…
Bucky:
The Lone Wolf (too easy)
scshunt:
Kevan:
Josh:
I hereby vow not to favor any Citizen (or Officer) to procede me as High-Programmer.
Succeed, right? Because you can’t do much about who preceded you at this stage.
Qwazukee:
I found like 4 bugs in this rule just at first glance, but I really don’t care to point them out. :p
scshunt:
As did I. Unfortunately, only one thing looks like it’s going to get through :(
Princerepulsive:
lilomar:
Yes, succeed. i was posting rather late last night, and for some reason thought that “Procede” was the opposite of “Precede”.