Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Proposal: idle fix

Reaches quorum at 18-0. -Purplebeard

Adminned at 04 Mar 2010 02:28:03 UTC

In Rule “1.2 Commoners” replace “Admins may render a Commoner Idle if that Commoner has asked to become Idle or if that Commoner has not posted an entry or comment for more than 7 days.” with

Admins may render a Commoner Idle if that Commoner has asked to become Idle or if that Commoner has not posted an entry or comment in the last seven days.

Just another little fix.

Lots of Commoners do nothing for 7 days and idle then more or less automatically.  But then, they could be idled at any time, because they have “not posted an entry or comment for more then 7 days”. These 7 days may not be the last 7 days, but any 7 days in the past.

I dont think any Admin would idle a Commoner, because he has not post a comment for 7 days months ago, but they should not able to do this, I think.

posted by Keba at 03 Mar 2010 17:51:02 UTC Comments (24)

Comments

Kevan: he/him

03-03-2010 18:04:28 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

03-03-2010 18:06:02 UTC

for

Keba:

03-03-2010 18:10:22 UTC

Just for the log: I edided this Proposal a few minutes after posting, because the phrase “or comment” has been deleted unfortuntely and without my will.

Additionally, we should mabye add “or has done a GNDT action”...

Klisz:

03-03-2010 18:11:57 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

03-03-2010 18:16:10 UTC

[Keba] There’s no easy way for an admin to check the most recent GNDT action of a player (recent posts and comments are easy, as they’re both timestamped on a player’s profile).

If we have people who are playing the GNDT subgame but never proposing or voting on anything, we should maybe consider a way to permanently drop quorum by 1/2 for that player. Although I’m not sure why such a person would be playing a Nomic, if they weren’t even voting.

zauper:

03-03-2010 18:19:57 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

03-03-2010 18:21:25 UTC

for

tecslicer:

03-03-2010 18:34:57 UTC

for

Roujo: he/him

03-03-2010 18:59:59 UTC

for

Anonyman:

03-03-2010 19:00:28 UTC

for

digibomber:

03-03-2010 20:27:01 UTC

for

yabbaguy:

03-03-2010 20:27:26 UTC

for -I’m actively idle in a sense; I’ve just voted on simple proposals and scavenged once. I really need to get more involved.

Wakukee:

03-03-2010 22:24:49 UTC

“Just for the log: I edided this Proposal a few minutes after posting, because the phrase “or comment” has been deleted unfortuntely and without my will.” <—Uh… this isn’t true, nor does it make sense… you just forgot to put it the first time. :P.

Rodlen:

03-03-2010 23:44:17 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

04-03-2010 01:45:33 UTC

for

Klisz:

04-03-2010 01:50:25 UTC

@Wak: That’s probably what he meant. Be easy on him, he’s a non-native English speaker. If you can understand him, don’t try to correct him.

dbdougla:

04-03-2010 02:29:22 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

04-03-2010 03:06:39 UTC

I’m laughing at the irony of your last comment, Darth.

Klisz:

04-03-2010 03:36:48 UTC

@Ienpw III: How is it ironic?

Qwazukee:

04-03-2010 04:40:38 UTC

for If it weren’t for core rule scams being discouraged, this could let someone win.

Bucky:

04-03-2010 05:19:26 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

04-03-2010 06:04:11 UTC

Darth: oh, it’s just that you correct people on their spelling and grammar all the time, even if you can understand them.

lordcooper:

04-03-2010 08:48:13 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

04-03-2010 10:27:35 UTC

for