Call for Judgment: I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.
Times out and fails 2-9. - lilomar
Adminned at 06 Aug 2010 10:32:24 UTC
flurie was not given a treason point for the proposal “Chapter and Perverse” by way of the rule “Treason.” His proposal was not treasonous. Change the GNDT to reflect this.
There should be no difference between promoting a rule created within a proposal and promoting a rule already created.
In both cases, the result after the proposal is that a rule of clearance level above the Citizen exists. In both cases, a rule of clearance level at or below the Citizen’s clearance level is created prior to its change in clearance. I’m not sure how one case can be treasonous and the other is not.