“Bucky shall no longer threaten anyone with the usage of any ‘loopholes’ to destroy the ruleset, gain supernatural powers or retroactively win all previous and future dynasties.”?  Only if nobody else does.

“Now, fail all proposals and CfJ’s that apply retroactively and undo any effects they might have had.”  Doesn’t this CfJ apply retroactively, then?  If so does it undo itsself?

The ruleset says CfJ’s amend the gamestate and ruleset when they pass. Therefore, this one can’t apply retroactively; it’ll only change the present state to make the ‘records’ say the proposals and CfJ’s didn’t have any effect, even if they did.
I venture that ‘retroactively’ can truely only mean ‘applied prior to enactment’ in Blognomic.

I like the sentiment, but isn’t the premise on somewhat shaky ground? Personal disputes between players should be resolved in the appropriate forum, not by our mechanism to correct contested errors in gameplay, don’t you think?

As far as retroactive play, I thought we had it bad enough with the sematic arguments that seem to fly around here. Are we going to argue about causality, too?

I agree that such disputes should really be resolved otherwise, but I thought it was time for our own ‘ultimatum’.
Already the current events are keeping people away from this game. If the situation would escalate further, we could find ourselves forced to give one or two Gostaks a more serious ‘incentive’ to play the game as it was meant to be played. I’m just trying to get people to resolve their matters before that happens.

Queue-speeding. Lars and Bucky will (hopefully) play nice, even though I don’t think we can constrain their game play by a Call for Judgment.

One more FOR vote to pass.

Those last two points aren’t enforcable - how can we tell players what their goals will be? - but I appreciate the spirit of this CfJ and I’ll sign it.

Sorry, not from me.  Anyway, if you don’t want any more proposals that apply retroactively, then don’t vote for them.