Gnauga!

Amnistar, arthexis, Clucky, comex, Darknight, Darth Cliche, Gnauga, jmrdex, Kevan, Oze, Qwazukee, Rodlen, SingularByte, Sparrow, teucer, The Cube, Wakukee, Wooden Squid, Yoda, zuff

Sparrow, you do realize it says ONE Member of the Staff, right?

Kevan

Kevan is in teh leed.

No he’s not, he’s tied with Gnauga.

CoV   Kevan, just because it would be funny to see the “Sixth Dynasty of Rogue Admin”.

Actually, the one member of the staff who has been mentioned the most with counted votes is Kevan, as I count one member of the staff as a specific member of the staff mentioned the most by counted votes, as appears to be intended.

@Darth Cliche: It’s ambiguous. I see the following two interpretations:

(1) Any person mentioned in more than half of the votes…

(2) If more than than half of the votes are accompanied by just one name, anyone mentioned in that way…

But I think you may have meant something like:

If more than half of all comments containing counted votes also contain the name of one Member of the Staff, change the name of the Member of the Staff mentioned most often to “Rogue Admin”.

?

(1) is what I intended.

(1) is what I thought, too.

Oh, wait, no, (2).

Posted at the same time as Sparrow.

I think 1 is most likely to be what the proposal actually says, and the only one that is possible.

Kevan

May as well go with the crowd. =)

Actually, aren’t 1 and 2 the same?

meh

No, 1 is safe, 2 is not.

I don’t see any difference…

The difference is that (1) allows as many people as you like to be mentioned in a vote, and (2) does not.

Both are worded in a way that implies many people may have their name changed. But technically, since (2) says more than half, and only one can be mentioned per vote, in the end it will be a single person.

2 makes lots of Rogue Admins, 1 makes 1 rogue admin.

2 just depends on more than half of the votes having a name by them, not the same name.

oh, right. But I think both are unsafe. 1 and 2

So the interpretations I see are:

(1B) Any person can mention as many names with their vote as they like. All mentioned in more than half the votes change their name.

(2B) If more than half the votes have a single name by them, all members mentioned by anyone who included a single name with their vote change their name.

I wonder what does Kevan think about this.

I say just veto this, since it’s just a joke anyways.

It would just cause more problems than it’s worth if it happened to pass by some weird happenstance.

Kevan.

Changing Kev’s name would involve way top much changing of history after the fact . . . think Ministry of Truth.

Hmm? Player names are part of the gamestate (Rule 1.2), and the rule specifically mentions being able to change them by proposal. It wouldn’t be retroactive, or anything. (And I could propose to change it back.)

Kevan

If I win, I will   this into the -y pit from which it came.

Ok, whatever.
Bang it’s dead