Proposal: Just so There won’t be any confusion
Self-killed.—alethiophile
Adminned at 19 Dec 2009 17:43:01 UTC
Add a new subsection to 3.2 Clarifications, titled “Names”:
* A word only refers to the name of an Adventurer if it is explicitly stated.
I know what the older players are thinking, and no, the italics is not a scam. For the newbies: We used to have a rule that made all italic text non-binding.
This also prevents a player scamming by having the name Djinni.

Comments
Ienpw III:
There:
Bucky:
Nausved:
Darknight:
alethiophile:
Grammar nazi: The phrase ‘if it is explicitly stated’, without any modifiers such as ‘that it refers to a name’, refers to the subject ‘a word’. Thus, this rule states that if a word is explicitly stated (i.e. if the word itself is written) then it refers to the name of an Adventurer. I think this is good territory for a veto.
alethiophile:
I do think the idea is sound, though.
Bucky:
To elaborate, this should only apply to the Ruleset, not (say) the first column of the GNDT.
Klisz:
alethiophile:
Yeah, it should. I came up with the name by putting the front half of ‘alethiometer’ (from His Dark Materials) together with ‘phile’. I wasn’t even certain aleth was a real root until recently.
Klisz:
Technically, alethophobia should be alethiophobia, though, as alethiophobia is slang and alethiology is not (it’s a branch of logic).
Klisz:
* as alethophobia is slang [...]