Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Proposal: Last typographic character standing

Reaches quorum at 7-1. Purplebeard
(copied from the flavour text to the Admin box. - lilomar)

Adminned at 08 Jul 2010 05:41:45 UTC

Set each @‘s Deaths to zero (except for the RNG, of course).

Add to rule Combat:

Whenever a @ causes another @ to die, they may select an item from that @‘s Inventory (before it’s cleared) and add it to theirs.

Add the following rule, titled “Elimination”:

If, at any time, exactly one @ has 0 deaths, that @ has achieved victory.

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

07-07-2010 12:30:07 UTC

for

Galdyn:

07-07-2010 12:31:59 UTC

for

lilomar:

07-07-2010 12:37:02 UTC

for

ais523:

07-07-2010 12:58:24 UTC

against Potential rather large loophole: idle, and just before the last player is eliminated, unidle.

lilomar:

07-07-2010 13:00:02 UTC

:QTINE: against per ais

Josh: Observer he/they

07-07-2010 13:26:25 UTC

This would be a great occasion to use :QTINE: ^_^

I think that the window of opportunity would be tight enough that I’m disinclined to change my vote. Also I’m looking forward to the bloodbath on Level 1 when this enacts.

lilomar:

07-07-2010 13:42:24 UTC

CoCoV ->  for I have faith that blognomic won’t allow this proposal to pass unless my fix is also passing.

Bucky:

07-07-2010 17:28:58 UTC

for .  Idle loophole is a non-factor because someone else will have won first.

Josh: Observer he/they

07-07-2010 17:31:17 UTC

@Bucky - I think that the use of the loophole is to prevent someone from winning - i.e. by tactically unidling when there are only two eligible @s left, with an enhanced chance of stealing the win.

Darknight: he/him

07-07-2010 20:35:28 UTC

for

dbdougla:

08-07-2010 06:48:10 UTC

for  for  for

I haven’t been paying attention to the rules… is there any easy way for me to die and remove myself from the running to win?  Don’t wanna be idle, but also don’t want to slow down the resolution.