Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Proposal: Make the Code of Conduct less spammy

Times out 8-4, Enacted, but does nothing. - lilomar

Adminned at 12 Aug 2010 17:29:19 UTC

Repeal Code of Conduct actions PROPAA, UPPITT, ALEBRK, FNSHHM, and all Code of Conduct actions whose designation contains “NEG”.

The High-Programmer probably wants to replace some of these with versions that are not as spammable

Comments

Kevan:

08-10-2010 17:43:42 UTC

imperial Who can say.

Purplebeard:

08-10-2010 18:09:43 UTC

imperial This is why I hate secret rules.

scshunt:

08-10-2010 18:23:33 UTC

imperial

Klisz:

08-10-2010 18:52:38 UTC

imperial

jmrdex:

08-10-2010 22:09:51 UTC

imperial

Ienpw III:

08-11-2010 00:58:27 UTC

against I don’t know what those do.

Darknight:

08-11-2010 01:40:33 UTC

imperial

lilomar:

08-11-2010 03:56:49 UTC

for

Keba:

08-11-2010 12:42:08 UTC

against At least you should state those CoC actions.

Bucky:

08-11-2010 19:59:25 UTC

These are all actions which can easily be repeated many times in a short period to adjust one’s PP and/or Treason scores.

lilomar:

08-11-2010 20:19:53 UTC

I’m not going to reveal them here, as that would encourage exploitation of them.

ais523:

08-12-2010 12:36:52 UTC

against No longer relevant, as all the CoC entries were removed by CFJ.

Rodney:

08-12-2010 15:37:14 UTC

against