Monday, October 04, 2010

Proposal: Making a connection.

Reaches Quorum at 10-1. Enacted. - lilomar

Adminned at 04 Oct 2010 12:37:06 UTC

Create a subrule to “Briefing”: “Contacts”, with the text:

An Agent may, if they have not yet done so when they had their current Location, telephone D-Ops requesting a contact. D-Ops should respond to this email.
Responses by D-Ops must be determined in the following manner:
If there are Agents or Impostors with a different Allegiance than the Agent requesting the contact, with the same Location as them, then there is a one in four chance that the response is one of their codenames.
Otherwise, the response is the codename of an Agent or Impostor with the same Allegiance and the same Location as the Agent requesting the contact, or “None” if no such Agent or Impostor exists.

Hopefully, a good way to try and find out who is on your side, without giving too much away.

Comments

Brendan:

10-04-2010 03:29:20 UTC

for But I’ll probably propose to remove the false-positive aspect; there’s enough ambiguity with people being able to change allegiances and the relatively low chance of being in the same location anyway.

Darknight:

10-04-2010 03:41:40 UTC

imperial

Klisz:

10-04-2010 03:44:39 UTC

for

Thane Q:

10-04-2010 05:04:28 UTC

for

Josh:

10-04-2010 05:59:32 UTC

for

Bucky:

10-04-2010 07:06:47 UTC

imperial

Purplebeard:

10-04-2010 08:30:26 UTC

for

Blacky:

10-04-2010 13:24:10 UTC

for

Kevan:

10-04-2010 15:02:08 UTC

for Although it could use an exception for players with “Unknown” Locations.

Kevan:

10-04-2010 15:16:35 UTC

Could also use a fix to stop your own name coming up as “the codename of an Agent or Impostor with the same Allegiance and the same Location as the Agent requesting the contact”.

Ienpw III:

10-04-2010 19:23:50 UTC

against