Friday, May 15, 2009

Proposal: Most popular person

Vetoed with quorum AGAINST -Bucky

Adminned at 16 May 2009 10:13:05 UTC

If the proposal entitled “The Social Side” failed, this proposal does nothing.
Add to “Social Structure”  the following text:

There is a GNDT column called “Support” whose legal values are the names of all non-Host Contestants.  A Contestant is said to Support the candidate named in that column.  The Support statistic represents the other Contestant whom that Contestant would most likely go to for advice.  A Contestant may change their Support to any valid Contestant as a weekly action.  A contestant who Supports an Outsider may change their Support to any Insider at any time.  A Contestant’s Support defaults to the Contestant immediately below them in the GNDT, skipping the Host, with the bottom Contestant defaulting to the top Contestant.

A Contestant can never have the same Vote and Support statistic.  Two Contestants who support each other are a Pair.  A Contestant who is supported by at least two other Contestants is a Leader. The Leader with the most support cannot be voted “Out”

Comments

Kevan:

05-15-2009 09:28:40 UTC

against You mean “add the following bold text”?

Psychotipath:

05-15-2009 09:56:41 UTC

No the bold is there only toi highlight the change.

Qwazukee:

05-15-2009 10:54:52 UTC

In that case, the rule would be doubled. . . .  against

delta:

05-15-2009 11:53:02 UTC

against As per Qwaz.

Wakukee:

05-15-2009 12:36:33 UTC

against

SingularByte:

05-15-2009 13:16:50 UTC

against

Quazie:

05-15-2009 13:40:55 UTC

against

TAE:

05-15-2009 13:41:35 UTC

against Unfortunately Quazukee is right, this doesn’t do what you think it does, or is at least ambiguous enough that letting it pass as written would not be a great idea.

Devenger:

05-15-2009 14:09:12 UTC

against Qwaz’s point, also, seems redundant; how often will a well-supported Leader be voted out?

Still, nice to see you having a go at making proposals again.

Klisz:

05-15-2009 15:10:28 UTC

against  per Qwaz

Bucky:

05-15-2009 16:00:52 UTC

against  for purely technical reasons.

Rodlen:

05-15-2009 17:33:54 UTC

against

firefaux:

05-15-2009 20:23:14 UTC

against

Darknight:

05-15-2009 20:34:12 UTC

against

Yoda:

05-15-2009 22:17:07 UTC

against

ais523:

05-16-2009 09:04:12 UTC

against Quorumed against by now, I think. Wow, quorum’s gone up a lot…

Psychotipath:

05-16-2009 12:02:21 UTC

Oh well, at Dev if the most suppoted leader only has 4 supporters then he could still quite easily be voted out.

ais523:

05-16-2009 14:28:51 UTC

veto Antiquorumed.