Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Call for Judgment: Move that rule

Quorums out 9-0. -Bucky

Adminned at 13 May 2009 21:33:47 UTC

The when Devenger adminned the proposal called ‘Reorganize the ruleset’, it was passing 4-3.  However, he failed to count the author’s implicit FOR, and thus incorrectly marked it as failed.

Should this CfJ pass, the previously mentioned proposal (found here) shall be re-opened (at which point it shall no longer be failed), and then enacted as per Rule 1.5.

posted by Bucky at 13 May 2009 16:57:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Klisz:

13-05-2009 17:26:05 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

13-05-2009 17:26:53 UTC

for

Influenza:

13-05-2009 17:29:32 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

13-05-2009 17:32:53 UTC

for

ais523:

13-05-2009 17:35:21 UTC

for

Devenger:

13-05-2009 17:49:19 UTC

for Hey, you don’t really know which FOR vote I missed. It could have been any of them!

Rodlen:

13-05-2009 19:28:57 UTC

for

Wakukee:

13-05-2009 20:01:07 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

13-05-2009 22:00:08 UTC

for