Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Proposal: No more anons, Take 3

Given the Anthony treatment—Rodlen

Adminned at 07 Jan 2009 18:53:50 UTC

Remove the text “If the Citizen wishes, he may post anonymously by choosing “Call for Judgment” from the Author drop-down menu on the OPTIONS tab.” from Rule 1.6 Calls for Judgment.

Comments

arthexis:

01-07-2009 20:44:15 UTC

imperial

Yoda:

01-07-2009 21:02:09 UTC

for

Yoda:

01-07-2009 21:02:58 UTC

Ironically, I actually won Rodlen’s first dynasty through an anonymous CfJ.

Klisz:

01-07-2009 21:05:02 UTC

I remember reading about that in the wiki.

Bucky:

01-07-2009 21:18:12 UTC

for

Clucky:

01-07-2009 21:24:15 UTC

against

the anon CfJ has its purpose.

Escher:

01-07-2009 21:50:12 UTC

against I agree with Clucky, there are times you want to get a ruling, but it’s possible that the knowledge of who requested it might bias the commentary.

Rodlen:

01-07-2009 23:21:02 UTC

against Anonymous CfJs have a purpose.

Qwazukee:

01-08-2009 02:11:31 UTC

against

Darknight:

01-08-2009 02:44:39 UTC

against As Clucky. I’m more for stopping spam CfJ then ending anon ones.

Klisz:

01-08-2009 02:50:04 UTC

against  s/k.

Rodlen:

01-08-2009 02:52:32 UTC

veto The Mad King’s legacy lives on.