Proposal: “Previous Days” clarification
Reaches Quorum (15-3)
Enacted by Hix
Adminned at 07 Feb 2007 22:24:31 UTC
In the Rule “Filmographies”, replace “if they have not already done so in the previous four days” with “if e has not already done so that day or on any of the 3 previous three days”
Remove all Film/Role entries on the Filmographies page that were added by Actors at a time when that Actor had already done so that day.
Comments
The Doctor:
Josh:
“any of the 3 previous three days”?
A necessary fix, but changing it to 9 days is a bit draconian.
spikebrennan:
Oh, and apropos of nothing, would some admin like to modify the Ruleset to conform to the recently approved Proposals?
Doremi:
Josh:
They have been - if you click on edit, you’ll see - you just need to reload the page. See the FAQ for more details.
Hix:
what’s this about 9 days? something I don’t see about my wording?
Hix:
Oh, I see. That’s an obvious typographical mistake (covered under Rule 1.1). Specifically, the numeral “3” is a typo.
Kevan:
Cosmologicon:
Clucky:
Doodle:
Angry Grasshopper:
snowballinhell7001:
alethiophile:
Elias IX:
ChinDoGu:
snowballinhell7001:
Typos can be edited by an admin per Rule 1.1. It isn’t a problem.
Excalabur:
It depends.. it’s grammatical as it stands, unfortunately :)
However, it closes a loophole, so
Tiberias:
ChinDoGu:
Assuming its a typo and not intentional. I believe there is a precident that if the typo made sence the way it read, then it couldn’t be edited by the admin… Anyone else remember that?
viewtyjoe:
Josh:
COV:
The number of FOR votes implies that there would be support for treating it as a typo.
ChronosPhaenon: