Friday, January 09, 2009

Proposal: Proposal: Watching Redub

Vetoed away—Rodlen

Adminned at 08 Jan 2009 19:27:14 UTC

In Rule 2.2, change the text

Every rule existing in the Blognomic ruleset is considered implicit in each Faction’s Ruleset, even if not written on it.

to

Every rule existing in the Blognomic ruleset is considered implicit in each Faction’s Ruleset, even if not written on it, with the exception of Rule 2.1.

I figure, now that so many problems have arisen, this might have a chance at passing.

Comments

Qwazukee:

09-01-2009 01:39:28 UTC

for Sorry about the double “Proposal,” I’d never done that before.

Yoda:

09-01-2009 01:40:29 UTC

against Rule 2.1 isn’t the main problem.  The problem is that all the dynastic rules are also in the faction rules.  That is what has needed to be fixed the entire time, yet my proposal to do just that was shot down a long time ago.

Yoda:

09-01-2009 01:41:54 UTC

It’s ok.  It’s not something that’s inherently obvious.  Also, you don’t have to vote for your own proposal because you automatically vote for it.  CfJs and DoVs, on the other hand, require explicit author votes.

Qwazukee:

09-01-2009 01:50:52 UTC

I knew I didn’t have to, but it can’t hurt. I’ll look for your original suggestion and see if I can’t repost it as more desirable than before.

Rodlen:

09-01-2009 01:55:51 UTC

against per Yoda.

Qwazukee:

09-01-2009 01:58:02 UTC

This the one you were talking about, Yoda?:

Replace the text “Every rule existing in the Blognomic ruleset is considered implicit in each Faction’s Ruleset, even if not written on it.” in rule 2.2 “Factions” with the text “Every rule in Sections 1 and 3 of the Blognomic ruleset is considered to be in each Faction’s Ruleset.  Every rule in Section 2 of the Blognomic ruleset except rule 2.1 “First Metadynasty of Rodlen” is considered as implicit restrictions for which each Faction must adhere, even if the Ruleset of one or more Factions disagrees.”

Yoda:

09-01-2009 02:28:21 UTC

Yes, and I just came up with an idea…

Qwazukee:

09-01-2009 02:47:43 UTC

against  s/k

Klisz:

09-01-2009 03:24:09 UTC

Methinks we need a veto.

Rodlen:

09-01-2009 03:26:50 UTC

veto Nuking