Proto: Making good on a promise
Add a new Dynastic Rule to the Ruleset. Call it “Turns” and give it the following text:
A Turn Boundary is an event that occurs automatically at the start of each week and each Thursday at noon. Turn Boundaries can also occur at other times as caused by the Ruleset or by proposal enactment; these are Irregular Turn Boundaries. The start of each dynasty is an Irregular Turn Boundary. The moment when Turn Boundaries cease to be defined (e.g. when this rule is repealed) is considered to be an Irregular Turn Boundary.
If a non-Irregular Turn Boundary would happen during Hiatus, it is skipped.
A Turn is the period of time between two Turn Boundaries; for the purposes of this definition, it should always be assumed that there will be at least one Turn Boundary sometime in the future.
Add a new subrule to the rule “Turns”. Call it “Turn-based Actions” and give it the following text:
Each Gladiator has a non-negative integer number of Action Points, tracked in the “AP” column of the GNDT. New Gladiators start with 3 AP. Any Gladiator who has not yet done so during the current Turn may set their AP to 3; this action is known as Refreshing.
A Main Action is a type of action. In order to take an action defined as a Main Action, a Gladiator must spend 1 AP; a Gladiator with no AP cannot take a Main Action. Also, no Gladiator can take more than 3 Main Actions in any 24-hour period. Whenever a Gladiator attempts to take a Main Action, if they are able to Refresh first, they automatically do so.
Finally, cause an Irregular Turn Boundary event to occur.
Proofreading is welcome; this is the kind of rule I’d like to last beyond the end of the dynasty. Also, help with regards to a fair way to handle turn boundaries during hiatus is welcome.
aguydude:
I’d replace “noon” with 12:00:00 UTC, or add “noon” to the glossary. I prefer the former.
I would also replace “should always be assumed” with “it is always assumed” . “A gladiator with no AP cannot take a Main Action” is redundant (first bullet point of Numbers and Variables). It seems unlikely that a rule will be introduced that allows one to “spend” resources that they do not have, so I prefer to avoid redundancy.