Thursday, July 07, 2016

Proposal: Re-Offended by your actions.

Timed out. Passes 4-2-1—Clucky

Adminned at 10 Jul 2016 01:12:18 UTC

Create a new rule called “Offenses” stating that:

Offenses is a value tracked in the GNDT. Scribes start the game with 0 Offenses. Whenever a Scribe performs an action that affects GNDT statistics of another Scribe, the latter can declare he is Offended by his actions up to one day after such actions took place, and subsequently increase the former’s Offenses by 1. A Scribe with 3 or more Offenses is considered Harmful. A Scribe who is not Harmful is then considered Harmless.

In the rule HHGTTG change:

If a Scribe is Mostly Harmless then they may subsequently be elected as {The President of the Galaxy}

to

If a Scribe is Harmless then they may subsequently be elected as {The President of the Galaxy}

posted by Izzoboetam at 07 Jul 2016 16:42:00 UTC Comments (8)

Comments

Sci_Guy12:

07-07-2016 17:01:40 UTC

for

Bucky:

07-07-2016 20:39:48 UTC

I think all the problems with this are self-regulating because unwarrented Offenses are themselves Offensive.

for

RaichuKFM: she/her

07-07-2016 20:53:40 UTC

for Per Bucky.

Which makes it trivial to work with someone to boost each other’s Offenses to any value, but I don’t actually know why you’d ever do that.

qwertyu63:

07-07-2016 21:22:06 UTC

imperial

Clucky: he/him

07-07-2016 23:35:00 UTC

Needs some patching but is mostly harmless imperial

Clucky: he/him

07-07-2016 23:43:12 UTC

against CoV

while proposing my fix, I realized the bigger problem that admins can be punished if they pass a proposal that changes someones GNDT stats.

while I’m fine with the general idea, I don’t want to risk that this proposal passes and mine fails. So I have mine as a safeguard but still going to vote against this to be safe.

Re-propose with my patch already applied and I’ll probably switch to a for vote

Izzoboetam:

08-07-2016 00:04:25 UTC

I sadly have 2 active proposals, so I cannot propose another time. I think your proposal is more than reasonable, and don’t see how it could fail.

Larrytheturtle:

09-07-2016 21:30:06 UTC

against Per Bucky. More people please vote against?