Saturday, February 10, 2007

Proposal: Sharing the Spotlight

Self-killed. Josh

Adminned at 12 Feb 2007 15:47:22 UTC

If the Proposal “Leading Roles (might) make you Famous” does not pass, this proposal has no effect.

Create a new Sub-rule of Fame with the text:

When an Actor adds a Named Role to eir Filmography of a filme which another Actor has already been a Name Role in, that actor gains 2 fame and the other Actor looses 2 Fame.  The Actor cannot post a Press Conference and no other Actor may add a role from that film.

Comments

Edometheus:

02-10-2007 20:39:08 UTC

Spell check, spell check, spell check!
against

Elias IX:

02-10-2007 21:09:24 UTC

for Admins can change minor spelling errors in the ruleset.

Amnistar:

02-10-2007 21:10:37 UTC

Alrighty then…can I correct a minor spelling error?  Or do I have to use another proposal?  The error that I see is “loose” should be changed to “lose”

Hix:

02-10-2007 21:11:23 UTC

for

Angry Grasshopper:

02-10-2007 21:46:58 UTC

for

You should wait until this proposal is administered—it’s not good form to change official proposals once they’ve been commented on.

ChinDoGu:

02-10-2007 22:09:02 UTC

against The guy who claimed it more recently gets fame?  Shouldn’t it be the other way round… Hey dude your just jumping on my bandwagon, i said i was in that movie ages ago…

Amnistar:

02-10-2007 22:19:27 UTC

The idea was actually that the second actor was getting part of the fame the first got from their press conference. Because that movie has already been advertised.

ChinDoGu:

02-10-2007 22:39:20 UTC

Hmm, Ah ok.. I see what your doing.

In that case… COV for

Edometheus:

02-11-2007 02:16:05 UTC

btw, whoever admined/spell checked it missed “filme”.
I like the concept, however, so: CoV for

spikebrennan:

02-11-2007 02:18:19 UTC

against In the second sentence, which Actor does “The Actor” refer to?

Amnistar:

02-11-2007 02:34:16 UTC

Should refer to the person who posted the named role.

Kevan:

02-11-2007 18:57:34 UTC

against Ambiguous wording.

snowballinhell7001:

02-11-2007 19:41:12 UTC

I see misinterpretation abounding with this one… against

alethiophile:

02-11-2007 20:04:26 UTC

imperial ???

Josh:

02-11-2007 22:26:35 UTC

Edomethius, adminning (and thus spell-checking) doesn’t happen until after the proposal has been enacted.

against

Amnistar:

02-11-2007 23:11:19 UTC

against SK ,doesn’t matter now