Proposal: Snacks for Everyone
Times out with a Quorum FOR (10-0). -Bucky
Adminned at 03 Dec 2009 02:00:24 UTC
Add the following text to the end of Rule 2.5.1 Basic Spells:
The spell Appetizers has “TAPAS” as its Activation Sequence. This spell has no effect unless at least one Apprentice has more items on their table than the caster. Its Effect is “Chose one table, add DICEX items to that table.” X = the largest value in the Table column of the GNDT at the time this spell is cast.
If a majority of the votes on this proposal have the word MULTI, use the following instead:
The spell Appetizers has “TAPAS” as its Activation Sequence. This spell has no effect unless at least one Apprentice has more items on their table than the caster. Its Effect is “Chose one or more tables, add DICEX total items to those tables, distributed at the caster’s discretion.” X = the largest value in the Table column of the GNDT at the time this spell is cast.
A method for adding lots of food items to a table. Also, a variant to add it to multiple tables.
Comments
Klisz:
Josh:
NoOneImportant:
Is that a “should, because I think it’s better that way” or a “should, because otherwise the rule won’t work” sort of thing?
Klisz:
“Should, because otherwise the rule won’t work”.
Bucky:
Klisz:
CoV
Darknight:
tecslicer:
Qwazukee:
Wakukee:
Excalabur:
NoOneImportant:
Just out of curiosity, what was it about the MULTI variant that people didn’t like?
spikebrennan:
some people like baby steps
Klisz:
MULTI doesn’t even work; it should say “EVCs”, not “votes”; otherwise you’re saying that the vote icons themselves have to include MULTI.
NoOneImportant:
Thanks, Darth. It’s so nice to see you being concerned with the strict interpretation of the ruleset.
Klisz:
I’m merely pointing out an issue that has been brought up before by spikebrennan.
Klisz:
And no-one’s included it anyway so it doesn’t matter.
NoOneImportant:
I believe the vote is 10-0 currently…