Monday, November 30, 2009

Proposal: Snacks for Everyone

Times out with a Quorum FOR (10-0). -Bucky

Adminned at 03 Dec 2009 02:00:24 UTC

Add the following text to the end of Rule 2.5.1 Basic Spells:

The spell Appetizers has “TAPAS” as its Activation Sequence. This spell has no effect unless at least one Apprentice has more items on their table than the caster. Its Effect is “Chose one table, add DICEX items to that table.” X = the largest value in the Table column of the GNDT at the time this spell is cast.

If a majority of the votes on this proposal have the word MULTI, use the following instead:

The spell Appetizers has “TAPAS” as its Activation Sequence. This spell has no effect unless at least one Apprentice has more items on their table than the caster. Its Effect is “Chose one or more tables, add DICEX total items to those tables, distributed at the caster’s discretion.” X = the largest value in the Table column of the GNDT at the time this spell is cast.

A method for adding lots of food items to a table. Also, a variant to add it to multiple tables.

Comments

Klisz:

11-30-2009 20:17:40 UTC

against  The “X = ...” thing should be within the spell’s effect.

Josh:

11-30-2009 20:40:29 UTC

imperial

NoOneImportant:

11-30-2009 23:21:33 UTC

Is that a “should, because I think it’s better that way” or a “should, because otherwise the rule won’t work” sort of thing?

Klisz:

11-30-2009 23:49:30 UTC

“Should, because otherwise the rule won’t work”.

Bucky:

12-01-2009 00:07:18 UTC

for .  I think it works.  X just gets substituted into the effect text rather than just the DICE roll.

Klisz:

12-01-2009 01:40:17 UTC

CoV imperial

Darknight:

12-01-2009 01:52:57 UTC

for

tecslicer:

12-01-2009 02:36:01 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

12-01-2009 03:05:14 UTC

imperial

Wakukee:

12-01-2009 05:11:09 UTC

imperial

Excalabur:

12-01-2009 05:17:33 UTC

imperial

NoOneImportant:

12-01-2009 17:22:19 UTC

Just out of curiosity, what was it about the MULTI variant that people didn’t like?

spikebrennan:

12-02-2009 03:09:19 UTC

for
some people like baby steps

Klisz:

12-02-2009 16:13:03 UTC

MULTI doesn’t even work; it should say “EVCs”, not “votes”; otherwise you’re saying that the vote icons themselves have to include MULTI.

NoOneImportant:

12-02-2009 17:30:21 UTC

Thanks, Darth. It’s so nice to see you being concerned with the strict interpretation of the ruleset.

Klisz:

12-02-2009 18:25:04 UTC

I’m merely pointing out an issue that has been brought up before by spikebrennan.

Klisz:

12-02-2009 18:55:14 UTC

And no-one’s included it anyway so it doesn’t matter.

NoOneImportant:

12-03-2009 00:26:09 UTC

I believe the vote is 10-0 currently…