specific author for
Vroom Vroom
Fuel Me

Quazukee has said that he will claim that this has been illegally edited because he is mad at me. It was not edited, it is legal.

Note that I theoretically voted on this proposal before it was posted. Clearly, Wakukee has done something illegal.

And now he edited the “poste” time.

So, vehicles are ingredients?

CoV

I didn’t want to make a whole new page for them.

note that that is also a seperate part of the proposal.

Can you prove that Qwaz?

“Vehicles may be added to the ingredients page by the writer”

BAD THING.

CoV Fuel Me

Another problem: None of us get any of our 10 credits.

More for the issues that this doesn’t cover then the claim that its illegal

Fuel Me

You should make a whole new page for them. Actually, why not make a whole new page for shop items in general? Aside from that, I have no complaints about this proposal.

None of us get the 10 credits we would start with.

I’ll post a fixed version after I yell at Qwaz and get some more issues pointed out.

It says nothing about not being able to buy vehicles or fuel if you have less credits than the purchase price.  Also, I think shop items need to have their own wiki page.  Perhaps, have a separate section for specific stations and a general section that all stations carry.

Credit values cannot be negative, so you cannot buy if you don’t have enough credits.

No, it just means that you can get everything for free with no credits.

but you must decrease your credit value when you buy somthing, and it cannot be decreased below 0.

However, there is nothing that prevents you from buying more than you can afford.

Before I propose it, would this be more acceptable?

Add a new rule entitled “Credits”:

Each Member of the Staff owns a certain non-negative number of credits, which will be tracked in the GDNT. Each Member of the Staff starts with ten credits, which can be used to purchase various items.

Each Member of the Staff who has no credits when this proposal is enacted will gain 10 credits.

If a quorum of votes contains the words “Vroom Vroom” and the proposal “[Hint] Faster Traveling through better roads” passes, then add a new rule entitled “Vehicles”:

There exists a wiki page called “vehicles” which lists all the vehicles which can be purchased. Each Member of the Staff may own 0 or 1 vehicle(s). This is tracked in the GDNT. Vehicles may be added to the vehicles page by the writer, and the amount of fuel each vehicle can carry is described there. The writer also sets a price for each vehicle in the vehicle’s description. As a weekly action, a Member of the Staff may buy a vehicle by decreasing their credits by the price of the vehicle they wish to buy and changing their current vehicle (including -) to the new one in the GDNT. If this would cause a Member of the Staff’s credit to fall below 0, thent it cannot be done. When a vehicle is bought, the Member of the Staff that bought the vehicle gains a number of fuel equal to the maximum amount of fuel the vehicle can carry.

If a quorum of votes contains the words “Fuel Me” and the Proposal “[Hint] Faster Traveling through better roads” passes, then add a rule entitled “Fuel”:

Each Member of the staff owns a non-negative amount of fuel, which is tracked in the GDNT. As a daily action, a Member of the Staff may purchase an amount of fuel by decreasing their credits by one per unit of fuel they wish to buy and adding that much fuel to their fuel in the GDNT. If this would cause a Member of the Staff’s credit to fall below 0, thent it cannot be done.

Neither this or ya newer one allow new players or ones that unidle to get their starting 10 credits

Actually, the fact that each staff member starts with 10 credits allows new players and players that unidle to receive their capital 10 credits.

“Some members of the staff are Idle,”
All idle members will get their 10 credits when the proposal is enacted. New Members will start with 10 credits.

Posted at the same time as Gnauga.

Warm

Ok, I’m posting my new one.    S/K

Sorry, bad time to go to a party. No, I don’t have proof, because I just could not think of a way to get any (I don’t know how to get this computer to make screen shots or anything). Just let it be known that Wak has been abusing powers he shouldn’t have in the first place. . . .

Tech anyone can edit a proposal.

Then let’s make it illegal! Is this something you want happening?

Quaz, without proof I can’t say he did or is doing anything wrong. If he did edit this noone knows what he changed. In any case this was S/Ked. If you still wanna talk about this send me a PM instead of here. Its easier