Proposal: The Devil and Daniel Webster
13-4, cannot be enacted without CoV -Darth
Adminned at 12 Dec 2009 22:03:18 UTC
Add a dynastic rule entitled “Devil’s Advocate” as follows:
If the Djinn receives from an Adventurer a communication in the manner prescribed in the Ruleset that contains a Wish, and the Djinn has not yet granted nor determined not to grant the Wish, the Djinn may (but is not required to) make a blog post containing the text of the Wish, with such redactions as the Djinn deems appropriate (which may include, for example, particular numbers or names of Adventurers). Such a post may be referred to as an Interpretation Appeal. Any Adventurer may, in comments to the Interpretation Appeal, suggest ways in which the text of the Wish as so posted can be interpreted, particularly in ways that would presumably result in unintended consequences to the Adventurer who was making the Wish. The Djinn may, but is not required to, give consideration to comments to the Interpretation Appeal when construing the Wish.