Monday, November 19, 2007

Proposal: The Real Valhalla

Self-killed, failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 21 Nov 2007 03:00:10 UTC

[ I always enjoy the random, real-world research that a BlogNomic theme encourages - I’d rather hear about arbitrary, interesting historical figures, than people’s favourite fictional characters. ]

Remove all instances of “or fictional” from Rules 2.1 and 2.1.1.

Rename “Rincewind” to “Harold Lloyd” and “Jack Sparrow” to “Blackbeard”.

Comments

Chivalrybean:

19-11-2007 20:25:16 UTC

imperial Oh, I don’t know… of this passes my most favorite idea I just had won’t be possible! I could see some kind of limit, like every other one you suggest has to be historical (or what about present day, is that legal?).

spikebrennan:

19-11-2007 20:26:01 UTC

for

Amnistar: he/him

19-11-2007 20:38:40 UTC

against

I like mythacal creatures!

Hix:

19-11-2007 21:04:51 UTC

(abstains)

I don’t look forward to deciding whether Jesus would be legal, though.

Chivalrybean:

19-11-2007 21:13:37 UTC

against since Hix abstained. I wont complain either way, though. I wont stop playing or anything. Either way would be fun for me.

Hix, you can always just not add anyone you don’t want in the game to the list.

Josh: Observer he/they

19-11-2007 21:15:04 UTC

for Very yes.

Amnistar: he/him

19-11-2007 21:24:16 UTC

Also Rincewing =/= Harold Lloyd.

Josh: Observer he/they

19-11-2007 21:25:33 UTC

The statistics fit, however.

Rodney:

19-11-2007 21:42:21 UTC

for the idea. against the result. Valkyries are fictional. Are we going to ban famous norse but mythical people from the final battle?

Chivalrybean:

19-11-2007 22:13:38 UTC

What if we limited it to historical and Norse mythology, for Rodney’s argument? Seems to complicate things, though. Simpler would be to just say all, or only real, and not worry about Valkyries being mythical.

BobTHJ:

19-11-2007 22:20:44 UTC

against Although I agree with Kevan and enjoy the learning aspect of this, some fictional characters should be ok.

Kevan: he/him

19-11-2007 22:47:06 UTC

I’d welcome the Norse-myth exception - I’d initially ruled it out because of the maximum-ten stats total proposal (it’d be silly to see Thor being beaten at something by Harold Lloyd), but that’s been self-killed now.

Rodlen:

19-11-2007 23:29:23 UTC

against

aaronwinborn:

19-11-2007 23:30:15 UTC

imperial

Shadowclaw:

19-11-2007 23:44:28 UTC

against What’s wrong with Rincewind?

Darknight: he/him

20-11-2007 01:29:07 UTC

imperial

Elias IX:

20-11-2007 02:57:58 UTC

imperial

Elias IX:

20-11-2007 02:58:19 UTC

Rather,  for  (CoV)

Oracular rufio:

20-11-2007 06:15:26 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

20-11-2007 08:01:31 UTC

That’s three deferential votes. You’d have to make tough calls on Jesus’ stats anyway, Hix.

Chivalrybean:

20-11-2007 15:27:01 UTC

for CoV - Despite wanting Rincewind on my side so I can defeat people with sarcasm, but I think it’ll make things more interesting.

Amnistar: he/him

20-11-2007 18:48:34 UTC

for It makes sense from a flavor standpoint I suppose.

Chivalrybean:

20-11-2007 19:15:38 UTC

Are we allowing currently living people? If not, no one could submit Jesus anyways (well, depending on what you believe).

Chivalrybean:

20-11-2007 20:41:12 UTC

Currently 6-2-5

aaronwinborn:

21-11-2007 02:43:49 UTC

against COV—though i prefer researching the historical characters, there’s enough fiction in history anyway. plus, makes for some interesting mythic/historical characters.

tally now stands at 6-3-4, assuming chivalrybean’s count is right

aaronwinborn:

21-11-2007 02:46:29 UTC

though i count 6-6-1

Elias IX:

21-11-2007 03:56:07 UTC

I think Chivalrybean counted FOR-DEF-AGAINST, rather than FOR-AGAINST-DEF.

Yoda:

21-11-2007 04:59:17 UTC

against Limits creativity this proposal does. An open mind one must have.

Kevan: he/him

21-11-2007 10:58:58 UTC

against  against  against Self-kill, I’ll repropose it allowing for Norse mythology, to make it clearer.