The revenge of the return of the son of the corrected nephew of the arrows, part III
Create a new rule, “Flavour Rewards”:
When voting on a proposal, Commoners should include an arrow icon (:ARROW:) in comments in which they vote, if they think the proposal is particularly flavourful or has good flavour text; this is not a voting icon, but can be used additionally to voting icons in the same comment. Within 48 hours of a proposal being enacted or failed, its author can increase his own Coal by the number of EVCs on that proposal that include arrow items, excluding EVCs by the proposal’s author but including EVCs by the Mad Prince, but only if he has not performed this action with respect to that proposal before.
Fixing a bug pointed out by Rodlen; now it counts arrowed comments, rather than arrows themselves.
Comments
Rodlen:
Uh…
ais523:
Also, htf did I end up with the flavour text box inside the blockquote?
Josh:
He could have fixed it until you commented!
Rodlen:
Because the blog is awesome in ways that none shall understand.
Ienpw III:
Klisz:
The flavor text box got into the blockquote because instead of a closing tag, you put another blockquote tag. Evidently unclosed blockquote = flavor text inside blockquote.
Keba:
Ienpw III:
I know what the text means. It is obvious that the flavour is not meant to be part of the rule. Notice that nowhere in the ruleset does it say that whatever is in blockquote goes in the rules.
lordcooper:
Klisz:
lordcooper: It says “EVC”, not “comment”.
hellzapoppin:
dbdougla:
Ienpw III:
Is not a proposal.