Proposal: The Social Side.
Passed, quorumed 11-1 with 4 abstaining by Bucky
Then unpassed because Quorum had risen by 1 in the meantime.
Then repassed 12-1
Adminned at 15 May 2009 22:00:13 UTC
If the proposal entitled “Voting out” failed, this proposal does nothing.
Add a new Dynastic Rule to the Ruleset. Call it “Social Structure” and give it the following text:
There is a GNDT column called â€œSupportâ€ whose legal values are the names of all non-Host Contestants. A Contestant is said to Support the candidate named in that column. The Support statistic represents the other Contestant whom that Contestant would most likely go to for advice. A Contestant may change their Support to any valid Contestant as a weekly action. A contestant who Supports an Outsider may change their Support to any Insider at any time. A Contestant’s Support defaults to the Contestant immediately below them in the GNDT, skipping the Host, with the bottom Contestant defaulting to the top Contestant.
A Contestant can never have the same Vote and Support statistic. Two Contestants who support each other are a Pair. A Contestant who is supported by at least two other Contestants is a Leader.