Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Proposal: There cannot be only one.

Timed out and passed, 9-2-2. Josh

Adminned at 15 Feb 2007 04:30:50 UTC

Edit Critics, so it reads:

Up to two (2) Actors may be Critics. Currently the Critics are Hix and Chronos Phaenon. Any Actor may edit this paragraph so it reflects correctly who are currently the Critics.

Any Critic who becomes idle ceases to be a Critic. A Critic may choose to cease to be so by posting a entry to that effect.

At any time, if there are fewer than two Critics, whenever a Proposal is enacted which has a Quorum of FOR votes, its author becomes a Critic.

Make Critical Acclaim a sub-rule of Critics

 

Comments

Josh:

02-13-2007 12:22:29 UTC

for

Amnistar:

02-13-2007 13:18:25 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

02-13-2007 15:18:46 UTC

against because a Critic should not be permitted to resign.  (Y’all are assuming that being a Critic is a _good_ thing.)

Edometheus:

02-13-2007 16:12:36 UTC

“At any time, if there are fewer than two Critics, whenever a Proposal is enacted which has a Quorum of FOR votes, its author becomes a Critic.”

I don’t like this part because it says that one MUST become a critic if one’s resolution passes with a quorum and a critic suddenly decides to resign. Also not sure that the proposed method to replace a critic is a good one.
  against

ChronosPhaenon:

02-13-2007 17:52:20 UTC

Spike: I can do the same thing now with 2 posts:

- I go idle
- I unidle…

Doodle:

02-13-2007 20:04:39 UTC

for

Hix:

02-13-2007 21:25:48 UTC

for Good. Gets rid of a GNDT column.

ChinDoGu:

02-13-2007 21:42:51 UTC

for

Tiberias:

02-13-2007 21:53:23 UTC

for

Amnistar:

02-14-2007 05:40:56 UTC

for

viewtyjoe:

02-14-2007 17:45:07 UTC

imperial

peacefulwarrior:

02-14-2007 18:23:23 UTC

for All righty then.

Excalabur:

02-14-2007 22:58:52 UTC

imperial