Monday, April 26, 2010

Proposal: ‘tis the season for core rules patches

Reached quorum 14 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 27 Apr 2010 02:16:52 UTC

In rule 1.2 “Voters”, replace

Admins may de-Idle an Voter at his request (unless that Voter asked to become Idle within the previous 4 days)

with

Admins may de-Idle an Voter at his request (unless that Voter asked to become Idle within the previous 4 days, and within the current dynasty)

Based on what just happened to Qwaz. Also, I think that showing that you can make meaningful improvements to the core rules is an excellent way to show that you’re fit to be an Emperor. (One of Agora’s win conditions requires you to have written a proposal that amends its equivalent of the core rules, for instance.)

Comments

ais523:

26-04-2010 16:44:22 UTC

Also, I just realised that automatic keyword replacement screws up grammar (“an Voter”). That particular bug must have been there for ages (it would have been “an Colonist” last dynasty). I wonder if it can be considered a typo when enacting?

Kevan: he/him

26-04-2010 16:46:02 UTC

for This one also got me, when I idled a short while before the sudden end of the Steampunk Dynasty.

Klisz:

26-04-2010 16:46:21 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

26-04-2010 16:46:37 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

26-04-2010 16:47:22 UTC

[ais] Yes, we’ve always taken those as “obvious spelling [...] mistakes” and fixed them under Rule 1.1, in the past.

Kalhaan:

26-04-2010 16:54:33 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

26-04-2010 17:12:51 UTC

for, although I’m a bit leery about attaching fitness to win to proposals to amend the core rules.

Put:

26-04-2010 18:21:39 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

26-04-2010 19:41:26 UTC

for

SeerPenguin:

26-04-2010 20:09:48 UTC

for

Wakukee:

26-04-2010 20:22:44 UTC

for

Keba:

26-04-2010 20:29:31 UTC

for does not count until I become deidled.

Ornithopter:

27-04-2010 00:02:26 UTC

for

dbdougla:

27-04-2010 05:10:08 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

27-04-2010 06:28:02 UTC

for Same as Keba, hahaha