Friday, August 13, 2010

Proposal: Troubleshooters, Please Explain your Actions.

procedurally vetoed. - lilomar

Adminned at 14 Aug 2010 05:09:08 UTC

Create a subrule to Debriefing, “Accusations”:-

An accusation post is a Blog Post with “[Accusation]” in the title. Accusation posts may only be made when all Mission Requirements have been met. Accusation posts must contain a list of Citizens to be terminated, and reasons for the termination of each of those Citizens. Comments on an accusation post which contain Arrows are Endorsements for that Accusation post.
An Accusation post is Accepted if any of the following conditions are met:
* It has 5 endorsements made by different citizens within 24 hours of being posted.
* It has 3 endorsements made by different officers within 24 hours of being posted.
* It has an endorsement from the High-Programmer within 24 hours of being posted.

If an accusation post is Accepted any Admin may terminate the citizens listed in the Accusation Post and mark the Accusation post as Illegal.

Create a subrule to Debriefing, “HOOC”:-

If all mission Requirements have been met for the past 72 hours, then any Citizen may Achieve Victory if they meet all of the following requirements:
* Their Clone Number is less than 7.
* Their Clearance is higher than the clearance of at least Quorum Citizens.
* Their Treason is less than 3.

Comments

scshunt:

08-13-2010 20:01:49 UTC

against

Bucky:

08-13-2010 20:08:01 UTC

against .  Accusation is already defined in Rule 2.2.1, and interacts rather poorly with that definition.

ais523:

08-13-2010 20:08:20 UTC

against The two halves of this seem pretty unconnected; accusing people doesn’t help you win at all, it only blocks other people winning. It also seems very likely that something like five or six citizens could achieve the victory condition simultaneously, bringing everything down to timing.

Darknight:

08-13-2010 20:38:50 UTC

against

lilomar:

08-13-2010 23:10:59 UTC

against s/k per Bucky. Forgot we still had an accusation mechanism.
As to them being unrelated, they are supposed to represent a debriefing and then last Citizen standing style end.
But I should have gone with my initial idea of using a formula that used Treason, Clearance, and Clone-Number to calculate the victory.
As to the five or six, I was hoping the ‘blocking others from winning’ would help to lower that number, hopefully down to 1.
Overall, poorly thought out on my part.

lilomar:

08-14-2010 05:08:44 UTC

procedural veto