Although we should clarify the language on declaring, achieving and being able to declare victory once and for all.

In favor of not having to be this ridiculously pedantic in the future.

This is definitely fixing the wrong problem. And the DoV should have fixed the issue at hand, at least for this dynasty. But eh.

I’d concur, but at least some of the votes in the DoV centered on my casting of PROUST, and not on the inherent validity of a DoV based on a legitimate PROUST.

, because it is clearly what PROUST was meant to mean.

I disagree that this is not what proust says, except perhaps the bit about the partners.

COV. I like the SOUP ambiguity, and as I’m probably closer to casting PROUST than anyone else I’ll argue that I’d rather cast it to the fates that arbitrarily hand Quazukee the win.

@Josh: Qwazukee, not Quazukee.

Whatevs.

...you are not my stepsister, Josh. Even though you happen to share a name with my stepbrother.

 
CoV…

Josh raises a good point. Might as well let an enterprising Apprentice make use of the ambiguity.

Hmm… CoV   per Josh. Time for a change of plans… *mua ha ha*

CoV   per Wak… *DUN DUN DUN*

CoV

I’m getting dizzy…

The MPA is commencing Operation Arabia. 

I’ll alert the OCA.

CoV