Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Proposal: Veto Bait

Reached quorum (9-0) - Devenger
I’m going to add an unnamed rule to the Ruleset which describes Kevan’s interpretation of the rule, and links to this proposal. I’m still a bit fuzzy about this…

Vetoed - Darth

Adminned at 15 May 2009 08:06:47 UTC

LET’S VETO THIS ALREADY

posted by Klisz at 13 May 2009 17:59:00 UTC Comments (12)

Comments

Qwazukee:

13-05-2009 18:04:57 UTC

for

Devenger:

13-05-2009 18:05:43 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

13-05-2009 18:07:08 UTC

If this is enacted, it should be required to be vetoed.

Klisz:

13-05-2009 18:07:31 UTC

...wait, what?

This will automatically get vetoed when it passes anyway.

Devenger:

13-05-2009 18:09:26 UTC

It doesn’t say it will be vetoed. If anything, it lets us all veto it.

ais523:

13-05-2009 18:09:52 UTC

for because I want to know what happens.

Influenza:

13-05-2009 18:38:29 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

13-05-2009 18:58:55 UTC

for I suppose this is a very vaguely worded request to add a new rule saying “Players are permitted to veto the proposal ‘Veto Bait’.”

Which doesn’t seem to have any clearly defined effect - we aren’t allowed to pass a vetoed proposal, but we can only actually fail it “When Producer votes to VETO a Proposal”.

Bucky:

13-05-2009 19:01:07 UTC

veto !

(err, I mean for )

Rodlen:

13-05-2009 19:36:28 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

13-05-2009 21:55:45 UTC

for not like it’d do anything if it passes lol

Qwazukee:

14-05-2009 04:49:41 UTC

This could be the first time that multiple Scripters are allowed to veto one Proposal. . . .