Friday, August 28, 2009

Proposal: Why won’t you love me any more?

Passes 9-1. - Qwazukee

Adminned at 29 Aug 2009 22:06:48 UTC

Create a new sub-rule, “Failure brings Anger” under rule “Infectious Anger”:

Whenever a Proposal is failed or vetoed, the author of that Proposal may once, within a period of 24 hours, increase their Rage by X; where X is the number of valid FOR and DEFERENTIAL votes on that Proposal.

posted by arthexis at 28 Aug 2009 13:41:47 UTC Comments (14)

Comments

Ienpw III:

08-28-2009 14:24:03 UTC

lol for

ais523:

08-28-2009 15:22:01 UTC

for This is probably about as arthexisy of a proposal as has a chance of passing under the current game custom of BlogNomic, I suspect.

Qwazukee:

08-28-2009 15:36:12 UTC

for

Excalabur:

08-28-2009 15:57:23 UTC

for  Careful reading of the definitions of the votes might be required. 

I like it, though not the VETO part.  Especially with the veto rules as they stand.

Bucky:

08-28-2009 16:17:09 UTC

for

Klisz:

08-28-2009 17:12:12 UTC

for  ais: arthexian proposals will pretty much always get passed under my leadership. He’s good at writing rules.

Rodlen:

08-28-2009 19:04:10 UTC

for

ais523:

08-28-2009 19:36:07 UTC

@Darth: by “arthexisy” I was referring to the sort of proposal which attempts to mess with the mechanics of voting or proposal enactment; they’re very common at other nomics, but kind-of rare here at BlogNomic.

spikebrennan:

08-28-2009 20:05:28 UTC

against
Needs work. Within 24 hours following what?

Qwazukee:

08-28-2009 20:15:10 UTC

Within 24 hours of “whenever a proposal is failed or vetoed.”

spikebrennan:

08-28-2009 21:35:10 UTC

That’s one possible interpretation, but it’s not the only one.

Darknight:

08-29-2009 02:30:38 UTC

for

Excalabur:

08-29-2009 03:52:16 UTC

What’s another one?

Excalabur:

08-29-2009 03:55:18 UTC

I’m also all in favour of mechancis that change the mechanics of the game.