Eh. I dislike the word “wins”. We are all “winners” here. IT should be “has achieved factory”

Where by “factory” I mean “victory” didn’t you get the memo?

...I think winning should be called “Acheiving a Factory” from now on.  Next dynasty…Industrial Age!

oh woops…

Haha. “I thought I had achieved factory. But it turns out I forgot about the assembly line. Thus my factory was void.”

Clucky: I’ll keep that in mind next time I make a victory condition proposal.

what is this “winning the dynasty”?

Eh, even though this looks like this is going to pass, I have to agree with Hix here.  It just seems too simplistic.  Fame will start increasing too quickly when named roles come into play, and as it stands now it seems to be luck of the draw whether you can get the After parties or not. 

CoV they give a good reasons.

Amnistar: Which reasons?  Poor terminology, too simplistic/random, or both.

Hix/Clucky/anyone else: If I shouldn’t require a declaration of victory, what is the best way to impose a satute of limitations on declaring victory due to a point event?

Tiberias: A rule like that is the usual: “The Actor who has managed to get his name cited twice at the main page has achieved victory.”

The statute of limitations is the entirity of rule 1.9.

per hix.  We’re starting to weave interesting concepts like Critical Acclaim, Oscars and Gossip Stories into the game—shouldn’t they matter?

Fame is still too easy to get and too undefined.

And with a maximum of ten fame… (vide supra Axeling)

er…fame’s maximum is 100 right now.