Proposal: Your Surveillance Report needs work
Adminned at 21 Oct 2010 13:16:57 UTC
Add the following to the end of the rule “Surveillance Report”
If an Agent does not have a Valid Surveillance Report, then D-Ops shall tell the Agent how many pairings between Codenames and Agents are wrong, without stating which pairs are wrong, if any and how many pairs share the Agent who made the Surveillance Report Allegiance, again without stating which pairs.
Even though I know Kev prob wouldn’t do such a thing, the current wording allows him to just say that a Report is wrong without having to say what you got wrong, thereby causing us to no doubt make new reports with the same unvaild reasons while throwing out vaild info. I think using the same rule as one of those memory guessing games, where someone picks four colors in any order they want and when you guess they tell you how many are in the order and how many are in the order along with being in the right spot without flat out saying whats right, is a fair trade off to Kev just giving out any answers. After all, isn’t that what us Agents should be doing? Though if wording is an issue then feel free to reword and repropose lol.