Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Proposal: You’re going down

Vetoed. - Qwazukee

Adminned at 28 May 2009 15:31:47 UTC

Create a new rule “Downstairs Boogie”,

As a weekly action, a Contestant (known as the Boogie Man) can attempt to lock another Contestant (the Victim) in the Basement by making a comment in the GNDT with the text “Trapping X” where X is the name of the Victim. The Boogie Man and the Victim need to be located in the same room, or the attempt fails automatically. Then, the Boogie Man makes a roll of DICEX, where X is their Looks. If the result is greater than the Victim’s Fame, the attempt succeeds and the Victim’s location is changed to the Basement.

As long as there is exactly one Contestant in the Basement, that Contestant may not change their own Location.

 

Comments

Darknight:

05-27-2009 01:28:28 UTC

imperial

Qwazukee:

05-27-2009 01:29:44 UTC

against That doesn’t sound like fun at all!

Bucky:

05-27-2009 01:49:28 UTC

against

Klisz:

05-27-2009 02:12:54 UTC

for

Ienpw III:

05-27-2009 02:26:22 UTC

imperial

Rodlen:

05-27-2009 02:55:07 UTC

against

“10 The Contestant eats poisoned fruit, and has an upset tummy. The Contestant must change the Location statistic of any Contestant in the Bathroom to the Lounge, and change their own location to the Bathroom.”

“that Contestant may not change their own Location.”

...Oh my.  That might be a problem.

smith:

05-27-2009 03:09:04 UTC

against

Kevan:

05-27-2009 09:05:15 UTC

[Bucky] Isn’t consensus that the negative always take precedence, if the ruleset says that players both can and can’t do something?

for

delta:

05-27-2009 12:21:07 UTC

against

TAE:

05-27-2009 14:12:55 UTC

against I am a little concerned that, as written, once someone is locked in the basement there is no way for everyone to get out.  If A gets trapped down there, B can’t come save him because if A then leaves, B will be trapped. Two people really can’t take simultanous actions in this game, can they?

Psychotipath:

05-27-2009 19:50:44 UTC

against

Yoda:

05-27-2009 21:20:04 UTC

against per TAE

arthexis:

05-28-2009 00:55:30 UTC

@Yoda & TAE: Yeah well, that is kinda the WHOLE purpose.

spikebrennan:

05-28-2009 13:17:20 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

05-28-2009 18:31:12 UTC

Currently 3-9-2.

ais523:

05-28-2009 22:15:15 UTC

veto because it’s going to fail anyway; I was planning to vote AGAINST, which would antiquorum it, so I may as well veto to save time.