Monday, August 15, 2011

Fweep - Don’t flirt if you can’t follow through

Fweep overturned, 0-3. Unfortunately - and please correct me if I’m wrong on this - I can’t see any evidence in the GNDT to suggest that Prince Anduril actually gave coppro the foul that the fweep required him to. As there was no “awarded foul” this can’t be transferred. This leaves me in an odd spot - I can either assume that the foul was passively awarded in the gamestate and that the GNDT simply doesn’t reflect this, and proceed on that basis, although that requires an intent on PA’s part that cannot be proven to exist and which leaves me liable to a follow-up fweep; or I can do the most I can without incurring any liability myself, which is to observe that PA’s actions have resulted in illegal gamestate that should probably be resolved through other means, and encourage the use of a CfJ to regulate the awarding of any due fouls. I’ve gone with the latter. -Josh

Adminned at 17 Aug 2011 14:46:41 UTC

Since someone needs to propose this and the Slip and Slide Suicide CfJ here looks like it might fail, I propose a new Fweep simply requesting that coppro be given a foul, without reference to his actions being reverted.



15-08-2011 23:07:03 UTC

This is not a legal fweep since it does not detail the nature of the foul.


16-08-2011 00:48:11 UTC


Josh: he/him

16-08-2011 07:01:02 UTC

against Fweep: Counting the Cost already does this.

Prince Anduril:

16-08-2011 15:12:34 UTC

s/k against Sorry - good point. Unfortunately Counting the Cost argues for a foul for the wrong reasons.