Friday, October 21, 2011

Call for Judgment: Legally Cleaning Up 1.7

CfJ is illegal because it does not “describe the issue” per Rule 1.7. -Ornithopter

Adminned at 22 Oct 2011 14:23:29 UTC

In Rule 1.7, change the text

Unfailed CfJs continue

to

CfJs that are neither enacted nor failed continue

Just in case Proposals are still illegal.

Comments

omd:

21-10-2011 05:30:52 UTC

Unfortunately, this wording is still wrong.  against

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 05:35:07 UTC

Awww, why did you vote. You’re live on IRC, we could have fixed it. =P

Darknight: he/him

21-10-2011 05:39:23 UTC

against

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 05:52:32 UTC

...

against, I guess. =P

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 06:07:50 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

21-10-2011 09:19:29 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

21-10-2011 09:37:03 UTC

against

scshunt:

21-10-2011 09:38:33 UTC

against

Shadowclaw:

21-10-2011 10:06:38 UTC

against

Wooble:

21-10-2011 11:18:05 UTC

against

CWW:

21-10-2011 11:40:31 UTC

against

Prince Anduril:

21-10-2011 12:37:22 UTC

against

ChronosPhaenon:

21-10-2011 13:29:53 UTC

against

Rodney:

21-10-2011 13:55:46 UTC

against

ais523:

21-10-2011 16:32:07 UTC

against

Brendan: he/him

21-10-2011 16:43:00 UTC

against

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 19:03:09 UTC

against

Josh: Observer he/they

22-10-2011 10:34:09 UTC

against