Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Proposal: Mid Fields

Timed out and failed, 2-6. Josh

Adminned at 21 Feb 2013 15:43:56 UTC

Enact a new rule entitled, “Complications”:

No rule may specify that a specific Honourable Member has achieved victory; any proposal that seeks to do so may be marked as illegal at any time by an admin.

Another attempt to quell this mechanic in favor of a different victory.

Comments

Purplebeard:

02-19-2013 20:22:48 UTC

against “Any Honourable Member whose name includes a colour and a type of facial hair has achieved victory.”

Also, ‘specific’ could be a bit more, er, specific, since something as harmless as ‘the Honourable Member with the highest Credibility’ would also specify a single Honourable Member.

I don’t think that this is the optimal type of solution. It’s much easier (and safer) to put stricter limits on when and how proposals can be resolved.

RaichuKFM:

02-19-2013 20:24:46 UTC

for

RaichuKFM:

02-19-2013 20:25:08 UTC

against Wrong button, sorry.

Larrytheturtle:

02-19-2013 20:33:16 UTC

against Just wouldn’t work correctly

Josh:

02-19-2013 22:10:48 UTC

against

Henri:

02-19-2013 23:31:24 UTC

for

Skju:

02-20-2013 23:18:33 UTC

against

MurphEngineer:

02-21-2013 15:39:10 UTC

against

RaichuKFM:

02-21-2013 20:39:16 UTC

against  arrow Because we’re preserving “Over 9000”.