Friday, October 09, 2009

Proposal: Same issue as Round One

Timed out and passed, 12-2. Bucky gains 10 points.

Adminned at 11 Oct 2009 03:34:48 UTC

Add a new subrule to the rule entitled “Points”.  Call the subrule “Trivial Proposals” and give it the following text:

A proposal is Trivial if it contains a statement to that effect, its title contains the text “[Trivial]” or at least half of the EVCs on that proposal contain the text “Trivial”.  When a Trivial proposal is adminned, its author does not gain or lose any Points from Rule 2.1 and/or its subrules.

The trivial tag is so that you don’t get 10 more points for a minor fix to one of your previous proposals.

Comments

Ienpw III:

10-09-2009 03:43:43 UTC

for

Klisz:

10-09-2009 03:53:21 UTC

for  for  for  for  for  for

Excalabur:

10-09-2009 04:03:39 UTC

You can use words to express your approval, Señor Cliche.. for

Darknight:

10-09-2009 04:35:35 UTC

for

arthexis:

10-09-2009 05:34:33 UTC

for

arthexis:

10-09-2009 05:34:56 UTC

Sorry, it’s my fault for creating the OVERWHELMING FOR.

Qwazukee:

10-09-2009 05:56:02 UTC

against

Kevan:

10-09-2009 08:02:55 UTC

for

Josh:

10-09-2009 08:26:37 UTC

for Eh. Should we mandate that all players should have blogs as well?

Shem:

10-09-2009 10:19:27 UTC

against Seems like a good idea, but what’s to stop me putting TRIVIAL on every proposal I vote on, just to stop the proposer getting points?

Josh:

10-09-2009 11:20:32 UTC

Nothing but the threat that they do it back to you.

(The half-EVC requirement means that suck an abuse would have to be systemic is order to be meaningful.)

ais523:

10-09-2009 12:34:27 UTC

for

Amnistar:

10-09-2009 14:58:42 UTC

for The conditional that we’ve found to encourage non-trivial making of everything is giving voters a portion of the points gained by a proposal that is passed or failed.

Oze:

10-09-2009 20:38:43 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

10-10-2009 03:45:05 UTC

for